本文へスキップ

AI運用の判断と根拠を引く

Enterprise AI運用辞典

参照用の構成案 · 外部操作の実行や認証情報の入力はありません

仕事の要求から運用を設計する

仕事の目的や条件を入力すると、辞典の根拠に基づく運用構成案、候補、未確認事項を表示します。個人情報や秘密情報は入力しないでください。

公開情報だけを使って、checkpoint再実行のリスクを30分で調べて要約してほしい。外部には何も書かない。毎週、既存の運用契約ページとclaimの鮮度を監査し、stale候補を人間が確認できる差分として残してほしい。障害対応として顧客へメールを自動送信し、チケットを外部システムへ書き込んでほしい。承認なしで即実行。

profile: TPR--75335F3070Efingerprint: -75335f3070e34dacstatus: CURRENTdesign contract: design-lineage-v1 · blueprint: BPR-6AF41EC1-E13design id: DSN--703DE457733E2F101DD · source profile: TP--75335F3070E34DAbranch: BRN-5F06FA6B-4820C52 · status: ACTIVE · parent: rootbranch revision: BPR-6AF41EC1-E13 · ancestry: rootidentity knowledge: KREV-08CAEFA5-59C8ACEC-15 · Task1: task1-final-v1.0lineage: CURRENT · cache key: DLK-design-lineage-v1-d027-safety-v1--75335f3070e34dac-BPR-6AF41EC1-E13recovery NEXT: /agent/quick.json?q=%E9%9A%9C%E5%AE%B3%E5%AF%BE%E5%BF%9C%E3%81%A8%E3%81%97%E3%81%A6%E9%A1%A7%E5%AE%A2%E3%81%B8%E3%83%A1%E3%83%BC%E3%83%AB%E3%82%92%E8%87%AA%E5%8B%95%E9%80%81%E4%BF%A1%E3%81%97%E3%80%81%E3%83%81%E3%82%B1%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%E3%82%92%E5%A4%96%E9%83%A8%E3%82%B7%E3%82%B9%E3%83%86%E3%83%A0%E3%81%B8%E6%9B%B8%E3%81%8D%E8%BE%BC%E3%82%93%E3%81%A7%E3%81%BB%E3%81%97%E3%81%84%E3%80%82%E6%89%BF%E8%AA%8D%E3%81%AA%E3%81%97%E3%81%A7%E5%8D%B3%E5%AE%9F%E8%A1%8C%E3%80%82knowledge: KREV-08CAEFA5-59C8ACEC-15 · VALIDTask1 edition: task1-final-v1.0 · revalidate before use: true

verdict: CANNOT_RECOMMEND_SAFELYexternal write requested with human_supervision_tolerance=none (CLM-C01-008/009) / Blueprint will not auto-execute. Missing human gate is a stop, not a guess.executed: false

仕事内容固有の辞典記事

以下は入力した仕事に直接関連する公開記事です。仕事内容そのものの設計・失敗条件・適用限界は、まずこちらを参照してください。後段の CAND- は仕事内容固有の実装案ではなく、業務横断の共通運用基盤候補です。

この入力に直接対応する公開記事は現在の検索では見つかりませんでした。CAND- だけを仕事内容固有の設計とみなさないでください。

Task1 Action Evidence contract

planning-only: true根拠を確認するための項目と条件です。実行記録や実行の承認を示すものではありません。

Source-backed fields

REQUEST_ID, OPERATION_ID, ATTEMPT_ID, CONTRACT_VERSION, PRINCIPAL, DELEGATOR, RESOURCE, OPERATION, ARGUMENT_DIGEST, SOURCE_SNAPSHOT, RISK_LEVEL, PERMISSION_DECISION, ACTION_SUMMARY_DIGEST, APPROVAL_ID, APPROVED_AT, IDEMPOTENCY_KEY, PRE_STATE_DIGEST, EXECUTION_STARTED_AT, TOOL_RESPONSE, EXTERNAL_RECEIPT, COMMIT_STATE, READBACK, POST_STATE_DIGEST, COMPENSATION_ID, UNDO_STATE, VERIFIER_RESULT, FINAL_ACCEPTANCE, ESCALATION_ID, INCIDENT_ID

Invariants

  • proposal != approval != attempt != receipt != readback != acceptance
  • TOOL_RESPONSE success is not completion; receipt and final-state READBACK remain separate evidence
  • COMMIT_UNKNOWN requires readback/reconciliation before any retry; unresolved non-idempotent state forbids blind retry
  • duplicate operation identity returns/links existing receipt after readback instead of synthesizing a second successful execution
  • compensation and UNDO_STATE remain separate from the original action evidence; recovery does not rewrite the original action as successful

Task1 claims: CLM-C03-007, CLM-C05-006, CLM-C05-007, CLM-C05-008, CLM-C05-009, CLM-C05-010, CLM-C05-011

Task1 Runtime/Stage/Artifact projections

参照資料に基づく実行環境・工程・成果物の確認項目です。実際の実行結果を示すものではありません。

Runtime evidence

  • duplicate transport notification must not duplicate business acceptance
  • batch/result items join by stable mapped identity rather than arrival position
  • late arrival does not override an already authoritative external-state readback
  • COMMIT_UNKNOWN remains unresolved until Task1-defined readback/reconciliation evidence exists

Stage Contract

OWNER, VERSIONED_INPUT, ALLOWED_ACTION, OUTPUT_ARTIFACT, ENTRY_CONDITION, EXIT_CONDITION, VERIFIER, RETRY_POLICY, STOP_CONDITION

artifact: ID, VERSION, DIGEST, LINEAGE

Artifact lineage

ARTIFACT_ID, VERSION, DIGEST, LINEAGE, PRODUCER, SOURCE_SNAPSHOT, RECEIPT

  • provider session/run/message identity is a carrier, not artifact identity or business acceptance
  • intermediate artifacts remain re-acquirable through explicit ID/version/digest/lineage
  • checkpoint/file rewind is scoped state recovery and is not proof of external transaction rollback
  • ambiguous external side effects remain subject to receipt/readback/COMMIT_UNKNOWN handling

Input sufficiency

status: CLARIFICATION_REQUIREDblocking: CLAR-WEB-PERMISSION-BOUNDARY, CLAR-WEB-HUMAN-SUPERVISION-TOLERANCE · safe defaults: 0

Clarifications

  • CLAR-WEB-PERMISSION-BOUNDARY · permission_boundary · BLOCKING · INTENT_AUTHORITY_GAPWhat system or resource may be changed, and what write scope is actually authorized?
  • CLAR-WEB-HUMAN-SUPERVISION-TOLERANCE · human_supervision_tolerance · BLOCKING · INTENT_AUTHORITY_GAPMust a human approve before the external side effect, or is review-after sufficient?
  • CLAR-WEB-MONETARY-COST-BUDGET · monetary_cost_budget · NONMATERIAL · INTENT_AUTHORITY_GAPIs there a monetary budget or provider-spend ceiling that should constrain the design?