# Streaming／Event-driven AI

CURRENT_STATUS: UNKNOWN
OBSERVATION: SPEC_ONLY
FRESHNESS: UNKNOWN
PAGE_TYPE: reference
CANONICAL_URL: /tools/ea-085-streaming-event-driven-ai
CLAIM_IDS: none
EVIDENCE_IDS: EVD-EA-085-URL-6288847FCE17, EVD-EA-085-URL-B76BA177074D, EVD-EA-085-URL-EF8F677C69EC, EVD-EA-085-URL-46FF421FAD2B, EA-085-R11-RESEARCH, EA-085-R11-WEB-READBACK
UNKNOWN_IDS: EA-085-UNKNOWN-01, EA-085-UNKNOWN-CURRENTNESS
OPS_IDS: none

## Summary
“Event-driven AI replaces polling with event-triggered execution, but safe operation depends on delivery semantics more than model capability. Assume events can be duplicated, delayed, reordered, replayed, or forged; verify, persist, deduplicate, authorize, and make downstream effects idempotent.”

## Current judgment
Event-driven AI should use an EVENT_TO_ACTION_CONTRACT rather than direct “event -> LLM -> side effect.” Minimum stages: authenticate/verify event -> normalize envelope -> authorize tenant/resource -> deduplicate/idempotency check -> persist event/inbox -> classify/filter -> invoke AI or deterministic logic -> validate result -> policy/approval gate -> idempotent side effect/outbox -> record outcome. Delivery “exactly once” cannot be assumed merely because the stream processor has exactly-once state semantics; external AI/API/business side effects need transactional or idempotent integration. Event time and processing time must be distinct, and late/replayed events require explicit policy.

## Scope
Enterprise AI Core / interoperability / architecture / implementation / security / audit / cost / operability

## Confirmed
- Event-driven AI should use an EVENT_TO_ACTION_CONTRACT rather than direct “event -> LLM -> side effect.” Minimum stages: authenticate/verify event -> normalize envelope -> authorize tenant/resource -> deduplicate/idempotency check -> persist event/inbox -> classify/filter -> invoke AI or deterministic logic -> validate result -> policy/approval gate -> idempotent side effect/outbox -> record outcome. Delivery “exactly once” cannot be assumed merely because the stream processor has exactly-once state semantics; external AI/API/business side effects need transactional or idempotent integration. Event time and processing time must be distinct, and late/replayed events require explicit policy.

## UNKNOWN
- EA-085-UNKNOWN-01: provider-by-provider event/webhook matrices, exact current Kafka/Flink release/tag pins, and tenant-specific event retention/residency. STOP_CONDITION: common Core event/action safety contract established; provider mappings can be refreshed independently.

---
- EA-085-UNKNOWN-CURRENTNESS: 外部根拠の再確認日がcanonical body/control-planeで確定していないため、currentnessはUNKNOWNとして保持する。日付を推測補完しない。

## Evidence
- EVD-EA-085-URL-6288847FCE17 (RESEARCH): 1. source class: standard/author-maintained specification; exact title: CloudEvents Specification; author/org: CNCF CloudEvents; canonical URL: — https://github.com/cloudevents/spec
- EVD-EA-085-URL-B76BA177074D (RESEARCH): 2. source class: official product documentation; exact title: Webhooks; author/org: OpenAI; canonical URL: — https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/webhooks
- EVD-EA-085-URL-EF8F677C69EC (RESEARCH): 3. source class: author-maintained OSS documentation; exact title: Fault Tolerance; author/org: Apache Flink; canonical URL: — https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-stable/docs/learn-flink/fault_tolerance/
- EVD-EA-085-URL-46FF421FAD2B (RESEARCH): 4. source class: author-maintained OSS documentation; exact title: Checkpointing; author/org: Apache Flink; canonical URL: — https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-master/docs/dev/datastream/fault-tolerance/checkpointing/
- EA-085-R11-RESEARCH (RESEARCH): EA-085 監査済みresearch / canonical revision binding
- EA-085-R11-WEB-READBACK (IMPL): EA-085 Web body identity / canonical readback

## Failure / limits
Duplicate webhook causes duplicate model calls/actions; retry storm; forged event without signature verification; replay attack; event reordering; stale event after resource deletion; fan-out amplification; poison event; dead-letter accumulation; schema evolution; event loop where AI-generated update retriggers itself; burst traffic/rate-limit collapse; backpressure; partial side effect followed by retry; non-idempotent downstream API; model nondeterminism on replay; hidden cost multiplication.
## Practice
Producer webhook/event support; event schema/version; delivery guarantee and retry window; signature/auth mechanism; event bus/stream retention; replay support; ordering key/partition semantics; consumer concurrency; model rate limits; side-effect API idempotency; tenant policy; dead-letter/recovery path.
## Practice
CloudEvents provides an interoperability envelope; webhooks/event buses/stream processors provide delivery infrastructure; AI inference remains a consumer step. Current OpenAI webhooks demonstrate retries/duplicates/signatures in a provider-specific path. Flink provides a mature reference for stream-state fault tolerance but does not by itself make arbitrary external model/tool actions exactly-once.
## Practice
inject valid, invalid-signature, duplicate, reordered, delayed, replayed, burst, poison, schema-v2, and loop-inducing events. Force consumer crash before/after model call and before/after side effect. Measure event-to-decision latency, duplicate inference rate, duplicate side-effect rate, lost-event rate, replay correctness, DLQ recovery, backlog age, rate-limit errors, cost amplification, and audit completeness.
## Practice
Persist event_id, source, type, schema/spec version, subject/resource, tenant, event_time, receive/process time, signature verification result, authz decision, dedupe key/state, retry count, trace/correlation ID, model invocation ID/version/cost, decision artifact, approval, action idempotency key, side-effect result, DLQ/replay lineage. Apply least privilege to event consumers and downstream tools; treat event payload as untrusted input and possible prompt-injection carrier.
## Practice
Add EVENT_TO_ACTION_CONTRACT and connect it to batch-completion events, file/email/log/sensor triggers, and agent actions. Use CloudEvents-compatible metadata where practical. Require idempotency at the business side-effect boundary, not only stream-state checkpointing. Re-pin provider webhook event types/retry windows/signature specs at publication.
## WHY_THIS_MATTERS_TO_UPDATE
Email arrival, file updates, logs, sensor events, completed batch jobs, and business events can trigger AI without polling or human initiation. The main enterprise risk is not whether a model can be called from an event handler, but delivery semantics: duplicate, delayed, reordered, replayed, forged, or bursty events can multiply inference and side effects.

## SCOPE_ROUTING
Enterprise AI Core / interoperability / architecture / implementation / security / audit / cost / operability

## CLAIM_OR_RESEARCH_QUESTION
What event envelope, delivery semantics, deduplication, replay, backpressure, signature verification, and action-idempotency contract is required before an AI workflow can safely react to events?

## EVIDENCE TABLE
1. source class: standard/author-maintained specification; exact title: CloudEvents Specification; author/org: CNCF CloudEvents; canonical URL: https://github.com/cloudevents/spec ; access date: 2026-09-16; release: Core Specification v1.0.2, stable tag ce@stable; locator: README / CloudEvents Documents; evidence label: VERIFIED_SPEC; relation: interoperability/support. CloudEvents defines a common event metadata format and bindings including HTTP, Kafka, MQTT, AMQP and others.
2. source class: official product documentation; exact title: Webhooks; author/org: OpenAI; canonical URL: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/webhooks ; access date: 2026-09-16; revision: current docs; locator: delivery guidance / signature verification; evidence label: VERIFIED_SPEC / PRODUCT_VOLATILE; relation: implementation/limit/security. OpenAI documents real-time webhook events, Standard Webhooks delivery, signature verification, retries up to 72 hours with exponential backoff on unsuccessful delivery, rare duplicate deliveries, and webhook-id as deduplication key.
3. source class: author-maintained OSS documentation; exact title: Fault Tolerance; author/org: Apache Flink; canonical URL: https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-stable/docs/learn-flink/fault_tolerance/ ; access date: 2026-09-16; version: stable docs current at access; locator: exactly once end-to-end; evidence label: OSS_PRACTICE / VERIFIED_SPEC; relation: support/limit. Flink distinguishes at-most-once, at-least-once, and exactly-once state effects; end-to-end exactly-once requires replayable sources and transactional or idempotent sinks.
4. source class: author-maintained OSS documentation; exact title: Checkpointing; author/org: Apache Flink; canonical URL: https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-master/docs/dev/datastream/fault-tolerance/checkpointing/ ; access date: 2026-09-16; version: master/current docs; locator: checkpointing modes / backpressure; evidence label: OSS_PRACTICE; relation: implementation/context. Documents checkpoint storage, exactly-once/at-least-once modes, checkpoint timeout, externalized checkpoints, and unaligned checkpoints for backpressure.

## FINDINGS
Event-driven AI should use an EVENT_TO_ACTION_CONTRACT rather than direct “event -> LLM -> side effect.” Minimum stages: authenticate/verify event -> normalize envelope -> authorize tenant/resource -> deduplicate/idempotency check -> persist event/inbox -> classify/filter -> invoke AI or deterministic logic -> validate result -> policy/approval gate -> idempotent side effect/outbox -> record outcome. Delivery “exactly once” cannot be assumed merely because the stream processor has exactly-once state semantics; external AI/API/business side effects need transactional or idempotent integration. Event time and processing time must be distinct, and late/replayed events require explicit policy.

## LIMITS / COUNTEREVIDENCE / FAILURE ENVELOPE
Duplicate webhook causes duplicate model calls/actions; retry storm; forged event without signature verification; replay attack; event reordering; stale event after resource deletion; fan-out amplification; poison event; dead-letter accumulation; schema evolution; event loop where AI-generated update retriggers itself; burst traffic/rate-limit collapse; backpressure; partial side effect followed by retry; non-idempotent downstream API; model nondeterminism on replay; hidden cost multiplication.

## AVAILABILITY_GATES
Producer webhook/event support; event schema/version; delivery guarantee and retry window; signature/auth mechanism; event bus/stream retention; replay support; ordering key/partition semantics; consumer concurrency; model rate limits; side-effect API idempotency; tenant policy; dead-letter/recovery path.

## IMPLEMENTATION_STATE
CloudEvents provides an interoperability envelope; webhooks/event buses/stream processors provide delivery infrastructure; AI inference remains a consumer step. Current OpenAI webhooks demonstrate retries/duplicates/signatures in a provider-specific path. Flink provides a mature reference for stream-state fault tolerance but does not by itself make arbitrary external model/tool actions exactly-once.

## TEST_PROFILE
inject valid, invalid-signature, duplicate, reordered, delayed, replayed, burst, poison, schema-v2, and loop-inducing events. Force consumer crash before/after model call and before/after side effect. Measure event-to-decision latency, duplicate inference rate, duplicate side-effect rate, lost-event rate, replay correctness, DLQ recovery, backlog age, rate-limit errors, cost amplification, and audit completeness.

## SECURITY / PRIVACY / AUDIT / COST / OPERABILITY
Persist event_id, source, type, schema/spec version, subject/resource, tenant, event_time, receive/process time, signature verification result, authz decision, dedupe key/state, retry count, trace/correlation ID, model invocation ID/version/cost, decision artifact, approval, action idempotency key, side-effect result, DLQ/replay lineage. Apply least privilege to event consumers and downstream tools; treat event payload as untrusted input and possible prompt-injection carrier.

## SAFE_WORDING_FOR_FUTURE_BOOK
“Event-driven AI replaces polling with event-triggered execution, but safe operation depends on delivery semantics more than model capability. Assume events can be duplicated, delayed, reordered, replayed, or forged; verify, persist, deduplicate, authorize, and make downstream effects idempotent.”

## UPDATE_WORK_HANDOFF
Add EVENT_TO_ACTION_CONTRACT and connect it to batch-completion events, file/email/log/sensor triggers, and agent actions. Use CloudEvents-compatible metadata where practical. Require idempotency at the business side-effect boundary, not only stream-state checkpointing. Re-pin provider webhook event types/retry windows/signature specs at publication.

## OPEN_UNKNOWN
provider-by-provider event/webhook matrices, exact current Kafka/Flink release/tag pins, and tenant-specific event retention/residency. STOP_CONDITION: common Core event/action safety contract established; provider mappings can be refreshed independently.

---

NEXT: /agent/start.json
STOP: This is a knowledge projection, not an execution order.